Episode 17 is now live. In this episode of Consumer Counterpoint, Kristine Argentine and Paul Yovanic discuss the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA), providing a high-level overview of its origins, the recent surge in litigation, and key compliance considerations for organizations. Stay tuned for a follow-up episode, where we will take a deeper dive
Webinar – Navigating Changes to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): What You Need to Know (Encore Presentation)
Thursday, April 23, 2026
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Pacific
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mountain
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Central
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern
About the Program
We’re bringing this webinar back by popular demand. If you missed it the first time, we’ve got you covered!
Join us for
Webinar – Changes Coming to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): What You Need to Know
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Pacific
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mountain
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Central
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern
About the Program
Join us for an informative webinar with our privacy experts to go over the California Privacy Protection Agency’s newly adopted regulations under
Federal Court Rejects Application of BIPA Statute of Limitations to Privacy Act Violations
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently denied Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider a prior dismissal of his privacy action due to untimeliness. In a case titled Bonilla, et al. v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc., et al., No. 20-cv-7390 (N.D. Ill.), Plaintiff alleged that consumer DNA network Ancestry DNA violated the
Seyfarth’s Advertising & Marketing Group to Present ANA Webinar
On Tuesday, June 13 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern, Seyfarth attorneys Kristine Argentine, John Tomaszewski, and Paul Yovanic will present at the Association of National Advertisers webinar, “Emerging Issues Surrounding Privacy Class Actions and Compliance in 2023.”
This presentation will cover the recent surge in consumer class actions, compliance considerations, and recent developments
Computers on Wheels: One OEM Settles Claims While Another Scores A Win in Cases Involving Allegedly Botched OTA Updates
This post was originally published on Seyfarth’s Gadgets, Gigabytes & Goodwill blog.
A recent motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement filed in federal court in Georgia will bring to a close claims asserted on behalf of a class of Porsche owners for a purportedly botched over-the-air (“OTA”) software update sent to
Privacy Law Trends to Watch: Wiretapping Class Actions Focused on Session Replay
Seyfarth Synopsis: In 2022, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals revived a class action lawsuit asserting violations of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (“WESCA”). The lawsuit alleged that an online retailer and its marketing agency violated WESCA by tracking visitors’ activity on the website through the use of session replay code. Following
Eagerly Awaited Decisions For BIPA Class Action Litigation in 2023
Despite its enactment in 2008, the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act’s (BIPA) legal standards were largely undeveloped until its emergence to the main stage circa 2017. But with the decisions in Rosenbach v. Six Flags in 2019 (standing) and McDonald v. Symphony in 2022 (workers’ compensation), and the recent $228 million jury verdict against BNSF
Upcoming Webinar: The Here and Now of BIPA: Updates and Developments in Biometric Privacy
Time of the event:
3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern
2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. Central
1:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Mountain
12:00 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. Pacific
About the Program
On Tuesday, February 7th, Seyfarth attorneys Ada Dolph and Danielle Kays will present a webinar entitled The Here and Now of BIPA: Updates and
FTC Rules Political Ad Marketing Firm Cambridge Analytica Deceived Facebook Users
Synopsis: On December 6, 2019, the Federal Trade Commission issued a unanimous ruling against political data firm Cambridge Analytica for violating Section 5 of the FTC Act by misrepresenting that it would not download personally identifiable information when it in fact harvested this information from over 50 million Facebook users. Specifically, Cambridge Analytica represented that